I thought the 404 was the error we were trying to correct which is why I placed the file there.
Gregory Casamento GNUstep Lead Developer / Black Lotus, Principal Consultant http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=352392 - Become a Patron https://www.openhub.net/languages/objective_c - OpenHub standings On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 18:23 Riccardo Mottola <riccardo.mott...@libero.it> wrote: > Hi, > > Ivan Vučica wrote: > > I saw this: this was recently addressed by replacing probe of > > example.org/silly-url-test because example.org started returning 503 > > or similar for that URL instead of 404. > > > > Incoming PR addressed this on every other platform by replacing > > example.org with another piece of infrastructure we don’t fully > > control, gnustep.github.io, so I merged it. (As I mentioned on that > > PR, worse solution would be if it depended on our infrastructure: DNS, > > Nginx, … on gnustep.org. Then any flake on home.gnustep.org or with > > Gandi for DNS would also start people’s tests failing.) > > > > I don't think this was the correct solution. Gregory added a file to the > websites, but that's not the intent of a 404! > Also, I think it is case-sensitive. > > I don't think the PR was a good one? RIght now we fail on windows (just > checked) and FreeBSD, Linux... so it is a consistent "broken" behaviour, > not just windows. > > Riccardo > >
