See below… Gregory Casamento GNUstep Lead Developer / Black Lotus, Principal Consultant http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=352392 - Become a Patron https://www.openhub.net/languages/objective_c https://www.gofundme.com/f/cacao-linux-a-gnustep-reference-implementation
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:28 Riccardo Mottola <[email protected]> wrote: > Gregory Casamento wrote: > > > > Unfortunately this can’t really happen. All of the apps > > In the GitHub repository are assigned to the FSF. Gap contains work > > that isn’t assigned or has a license different from the gpl. So it > > would need to have a separate identity. > > Theoretically we could partially unbundle GAP and put separate projects > here and there, e.g. things in the gnustep-nonfsf project. > I don't think it is worth the effort, the loss of history, but it could > be done. I agree. I think things should stay as they are for now. I still can’t seem to commit to Savannah though I think that is a certificate issue. All apps and libraries I work on are LGPL/GPL - although Terminal has > the infamous "V2 only" version. I believe it carries this restriction because of the Linux console code it has incorporated. I would have liked to have ported some of the apps from OPENSTEP to work as a terminal as those were more vt100/ vt200 compliant. If GAP can't stay in gnustep project, it cannot stay probably also with > the current read/write repository copy we have now, following the same > logic. Indeed. I only put it into the GNUStep repo for convenience but it shouldn’t be there for a number of reasons. I am going to use this weekend to get any changes that are in it back into Savannah. At some point though I really would like to consider moving it to a git based repo, not necessarily github. Riccardo > Yours, GC
