At 9:44 AM -0700 8/4/00, William X. Walsh wrote:
>Hello Derek,
>
>Friday, August 04, 2000, 8:44:30 AM, you wrote:
>
>>>I don't know if I agree with this anymore. At one time, this was the
>>>case, but times change, and now there are very few surfers, almost an
>>>insignificant number, who do not have access to the flash plugins with
>>>their browsers. I think more and more this is becoming a universal
>>>option, and as such, it is time to start accepting it as a part of the
>>>tools available to websites.
>
>> I could have lived (and can live) with Flash, what annoyed ME was
>> that was available WASN'T Flash... it was a Flash file wrapped in a
>> Windows binary, so that even those of us with Mac's who COULD have
>> viewed a Flash file, couldn't, because someone felt that EXE was
>> better than making the SWF available.
>
>> *grumble grumble*
>
>Thats a legitimate grumble. Maybe next time instead of a windows
>executable they can release it as a flash file.
Maybe they could see this discussion, take note of it an also release
the SWF's for what's there now, so that those of us who've been using
Macs can see what we've been missing? ;-)
{hint hint hint}
D
