> Not true. .ca does offer synchronous connections. Obviously they need to
> work on their stability and such...
Er, yeah. That's what I meant. I must have been thinking of the *old*
.CA system.
It is Monday, after all. :)
> Also, the brunt of the cost comes from building the interface initially,
> if you do right, in either case it should require little intervention on
> an on-going basis.
Also true.
I guess my point was something along the lines of "just because the markup
on gTLDs is x dollars/percent, doesn't mean the markup on ccTLDs needs to be
the same."
- Colin
