[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Why, what's the harm in that. If everyone can speak his mind, why not > OpenSRS ? > If OpenSRS staff/management does not answer and remain quite then let's put it this way. They know very well that the price should be reduced, but are afraid to comment in case RSPs force them to do so. I feel that this Open SRS (sic) is in dire need of competion just like the NSI Registry is in need of. I have no choice but to continue useing them as Open SRS is a monopoly just like NSI Registry is. :) Thank you, Bruce.
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows stance on seco... Bruce P.
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows stance on... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows stanc... Bruce P.
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows s... Patrick Greenwell
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows s... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- NSI Selling domains for... Catapult Hostmaster
- Re[2]: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows stance... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[2]: Afternic/RCOM: Tucow... wsp
- Re[4]: Afternic/RCOM: Tucow... William X. Walsh
- Re: Re[4]: Afternic/RCO... wsp
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tuco... Bruce P.
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tuco... Doytchin Spiridonov
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tuco... ecs
- Re[2]: Afternic/RCOM: T... William X. Walsh
- OpenSRS Pricing Patrick Corliss
- Re: Re[2]: Afternic/RCOM: T... Lee Hodgson - DomainGuideBook.com
- Re: Re[2]: Afternic/RCO... agro engineers
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows stanc... Bruce P.
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows s... Swerve
- FORGER ON THE LIST Patrick Corliss
- Re: Afternic/RCOM: Tucows s... wsp
