Thanks for your feedback!
Regards,
sA
At 04:33 PM 7/18/01 +0200, you wrote:
> > - should we introduce handles that would work across profiles
> (essentially,
> > you can assign a role to a handle, and then modify that handle as
> necessary)
>
>yes
>
> > - if we were to increase the power of certain roles (technical contact
> > control of NS's for example), how should we introduce this? How should we
> > deal with legacy roles of this type - extend them the same power
> > automagically, or require that they specifically ask for the new role type
>
>Probably automagically, otherwise it will probably produce too much hazzle.
>However, it should be possible to "opt" in or out of the extra permissions
>for
>a profile owner. (That means, if a profile owner doesn't want this, he should
>be able to prohibit this, in general or domain-by-domain, whatever you seem
>fit to implement.)
>
> > - how important would providing support for existing handles at other
> > registries be? would it be worth supporting this considering the large
> > complexities it would introduce to development?
> >
>
>You mean a re-use of a handle from NSI or so? I think that's not important.
>
>Kai
>
>--
>
>Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
>Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
>IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
>ClubWin - Help for Windows Users: http://www.clubwin.com
>
Scott Allan
Director OpenSRS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
