Hello Bill,
We have gone off course from the original discussion to who knows where.
Eric pointed out a message that OpenSRS says they will not be doing the type
of services I suggested.
I have conceded that since OpenSRS stated it is a bad idea there is really
no need to continue the discussion since they will not be providing the
services
later
David
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill Gerrard
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 11:54 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Re[2]: Wish List
>
>
> > Please keep the discussion relevant. This appears to be some sort of
> > personal attack, that usually happens when someone does not have a valid
> > argument.
>
> Sorry, but as most anyone can tell you, I don't do personal
> attacks and this
> discussion is relevant. The thread that I referenced did answer your
> questions as it was already discussed last year and opensrs did
> respond last
> year.
>
> > -What exactly does the fact that my email address changed have
> to do with
> > anything?
> > (if you noticed which I am sure you did but ignored, my
> signature is the
> > same)
> > -What exactly does the fact that I made the same arguments
> previously have
> > to do with anything?
>
> The thread one year ago said that opensrs would not be successful (or as
> successful as their competing registrars) if they did not include
> forwarding, etc., yet one year later they are the fastest growing
> registrar
> around.
>
> Regarding your e-mail address, it doesn't matter that it changed, I just
> noticed (while working on something else) the similarity in the
> name and was
> just mentioning that this same discussion occurred last year.
>
> > And if you noticed
> > -my points are similar then as they are now ...
> > -you did not find any message in which openSRS supports your incorrect
> > position
>
> Sorry, but I was not looking for any messages that "support my incorrect
> position". I have better things to do. I'm not sure why you
> feel the need
> to attack people when they say that they have seen statements from opensrs
> stating certain things.
>
> > once again it is sad you are reduced to attacking me instead of
> supporting
> > your position
>
> When have I been reduced to attacking? I was just trying to be helpful by
> being another independent party that had seen the statements of opensrs in
> the past. I'm sorry that I don't save every message that they send to me
> (whether on the mailing lists, directly, or in broadcast reseller
> announcements). The recurring theme of opensrs is they do want to expand
> what they offer their resellers, but they do not want to compete directly
> with their resellers. This is what sets opensrs apart from every other
> registrar out there.
>
> Regards,
> Bill
>
>
>
