Ah Mr. Walsh,
Again Mr. Walsh you are asked to contribute.
(yes I would like to get nasty on this rebuke but to what good?)
{From a spokesman from VRSN, Mr. Gomes}
Eric,
We would welcome feedback from such a working group with regard to our
Wait Listing Proposal if it could be provided by the end of January.
Our plan was to seek such feedback from interested constituencies after
we had received it from the registrars. We started with the registrars
because any such service would have to be offered directly to consumers
by registrars.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Dierker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RFC;-)
>
>
> Dear Mr. Gomes,
>
> I hope with all the hoopla that the new year finds you well and all of
> your family prospering.
>
> I request your comments on behalf of your company to the following.
>
> May we in the GA count on your company's' appraisal of a GA
> working group regarding the Deletion Matter prior to your taking
> further action?
> (this would assume that we form a group post haste, form it
> in a sublist, assure its' openness and transparency, reach a
> valid consensus, allow for dissenting opinion, and deliver a
> tentative draft by the end of January)
>
> Of course it is informal, but through openness and transparency,
> you could afford it the weight it deserves. I would ask that
> Masseurs.
> Wesson and Walsh initially chair the group and that Mr. Lovell and
> Mr. Roessler act as Co-Secretariat. I would further ask that Mr.
> Steinberg, Mr. Svennson and Ms. McKee informally monitor and
> watchdog it. By breaking it up so the workload should not be
> too burdensome on any.
>
> Cross posting to the GA main would be allowed and we would
> ask the Secretariat to provide updates in summary form to
> to the main body, which could be forwarded to other lists.
>
> Mr. Gomes would your company recognize such an endeavor and
> consider it?
>
> Sincerely,
> Eric
>
William X Walsh wrote:
> Wednesday, Wednesday, January 09, 2002, 4:40:00 AM, Eric Dierker wrote:
>
> > No sir that is not my point,
>
> > Perhaps I spoke poorly. What I mean is that we are not producing what we can.
>
> > No backroom deals here. On the GA list I have achieved a rare bit of concession.
>
> > Mr. Gomes has agreed to take into consideration the results directly from a GA
> > working group on this issue.
>
> You have done no such thing, Eric.
>
> You again are having delusions of Grandeur. Let the real people
> discuss things on the GA list without your interference and attempts
> at self promotion, ok?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> William X Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --
