I believe all of the Domain Registry of America/Canada domains however are
locked when they've successfully slammed a domain, this to protect from domain
owners from maliciously hijacking their own names back, of course...


Quoting domainguru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> eNom don't lock all their domains.
> 
> Thanks!
> Lee Hodgson - Author of the groundbreaking "6.30 AM Domain Goldrush"
> articles.
> e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> w: http://www.domainguru.com <- Your Personal Domain Name Consultant.
> FREE expiring domain searches at http://expire.domainguru.com
> "Insider's Guide To Domain Name Speculation" -
> http://books.domainguru.com
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Mike Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Oleg Chebotarev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2002 2:25 AM
> Subject: Re: Identifying locked domains?
> 
> 
> > I know eNOM shows this information [1], but since (I believe) they
> lock
> > ALL their domains this is more of a marketing thing than anything
> else.
> > Otherwise anyone who was parsing through whois could see unprotected
> > domains (and that wouldn't be good!)
> >
> > [1] Status: PROTECTED
> >   Note: To help prevent malicious domain hijacking and domain
> >         transfer errors, the registrar has protected the registrant
> >         of this domain name registrant by locking it.  Any attempted
> >         transfers will be denied at the registry until the registrant
> >         requests otherwise. The registrant for the name may unlock
> >         the name at any time at the current registrar in order for
> >         a transfer initiation to succeed
> >
> > Charles Daminato
> > TUCOWS Product Manager
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > On Thu, 16 May 2002, Mike Allen wrote:
> >
> > > let me go and see if I can find the names I looked up. I saw one
> using
> > > OpenSRS's who-is but I can' remember the domain names now that I
> seareched
> > > that said that... Let me try and
> > > think of what the names were. (I wish I had wrote them down now)
> > >
> > > I couldn't tell who it was registered with though... As soon as I
> find
> one
> > > of then names I looked up I will send it out to you. (I saw this
> the
> other
> > > day - I will dig in the e-mails and find the name)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
> > > (812) 275-8425 - Office
> > > (815) 364-1278 - Fax
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Oleg Chebotarev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "Mike Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 2:39 PM
> > > Subject: Re: Identifying locked domains?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Mike Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > I would like it ;)  And a button to tell you all the ones in
> your
> > > > > profile
> > > > > that are locked and a button to show all that are un-locked ;)
> They
> > > > > really
> > > > > need to get locked as I have noticed that some who-is lookups
> at
> > > > > different
> > > > > places
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Could you tell where?
> > > > Oleg
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > tell you if a domain is locked, and if they don't tell you
> > > > > they are
> > > > > locked then it is safe to assume that they are not locked. I
> see
> > > > > people
> > > > > searching the who-is and finding the un-locked domain and
> throwing
> > > > > them in a
> > > > > data-base and then sending renewal letters. I would like to
> head
> that
> > > > > problem off at the pass before it starts by some BoZo!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > (812) 275-8425 - Office
> > > > > (815) 364-1278 - Fax
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > http://www.4CheapDomains.Net
> > > > > (812) 275-8425 - Office
> > > > > (815) 364-1278 - Fax
> > > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > From: "Ken Joy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:15 PM
> > > > > Subject: RE: Identifying locked domains?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > It's not possible right now, though it sounds like it might
> be
> > > > > useful....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I can submit an enhancement request...probably I would add a:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 'All Locked'
> > > > > >
> > > > > > to the drop down list in the Search Domains page of the RWI
> (and
> > > > > perhaps
> > > > > an
> > > > > > API call for same).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ken
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Marc
> > > > > St-Pierre
> > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 6:11 AM
> > > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Identifying locked domains?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm interested in such a feature too.  anyone?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Is there search to identify all domains by
> locked/unlocked
> > > > > status
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > > RWI?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Even our most savvy customers are being fooled by these
> > > > > misleading
> > > > > > > > invoices from other registrars and we want to ensure ALL
> our
> > > > > domains
> > > > > > > > are locked.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Melissa
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Cyberlogic
> > > > > > > 4545, rue St-Denis, Montreal (Quebec) H2J 2L4
> > > > > > > Tel: (514) 844-9946 Fax: (514) 844-9799
> > > > > > > e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Web: http://www.cyberlogic.ca
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
> > > > http://launch.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> 
> 

Reply via email to