Hello ezgoing,

Ahh, we've known about these issues since the beginning and find them
acceptable. The problem hasn't been exagerated enough for it to be a
concern to us.

Because of all the forefront discussions on these same issues, I had
thought you were referring to some other type of control over domains
that would be legally acceptable for OpenSRS to provide.

-- 
Best regards,
 I-Dotter.com                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
=======================================================
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 10:33:58 PM, you wrote:

e> Is this a serious question?  I don't comment often anymore but I could not
e> believe this was a serious question.

e> If so just do a search through the archives.  This issue of lack of control
e> has many faces and has been raised many times  for the last two years on the
e> list that I remember.

e> It was also one of the two reasons we left OpenSRS and currently only
e> service clients that wish to renew with OpenSRS instead of switching
e> registrars.

e> And we do not regret leaving nor intend on coming back, as price was never
e> the issue that caused us to leave, but the inability to solve our client
e> problems ourselves.  Not email OpenSRS support and wait for them to resolve
e> the problem but resolve it ourselves for OUR clients.

e> And let's not forget the unfairness in how OpenSRS treats their resellers
e> when it comes to chargebacks.  Both are serious drawbacks with the OpenSRS
e> system of management.

e> Both of which are not problems with our current Registrar as they prefer we
e> resolve problems for our clients.

e> Need some hints?

e> Can you provide your client a new password if they lose their current
e> password and their email address has changed?   Your client, you should know
e> them and be able to handle such a simple problem for them.

e> Or update their email address for them without them jumping through hoops?
e> If they host the domain with you it should be a very simple procedure for
e> you to change their admin email address.  That was possible even in the bad
e> old days of Network Solutions when we were just the tech contact.

e> And if you prove to them that the person who ordered the domain name through
e> your services used a stolen credit card to purchase a domain name do they
e> refund any of the money YOU paid them for the domain?  Or return the domain
e> name to you, for what ever you wish to do with it?  You paid for the domain,
e> you would think they would turn it over to you when you proved the purchase
e> was fraudulent.

e> What?  They will turn off the domain and keep it themselves for the year,
e> along with your money, but they will not return it to you?  If your proof
e> was sufficient for them to take the domain away from the registrant, why was
e> it not sufficient enough to return it to the person who paid them for the
e> domain, you the reseller?

e> But wait,  I suggested you do the research yourself so I should not be
e> providing you all the answers.

e> And I am sure OpenSRS would prefer I not provide you additional examples.




e> ----- Original Message -----
e> From: "I-Dotter.com OpenSRS-Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 1:05 PM
e> Subject: Re[2]: Back to OpenSRS I come


>> Hello Sergei,
>>
>> This email should've gone to the list.
>>
>> ===
>> What do you mean "Real reason was control over domain - only one thing
>> that OpenSRS can't or don't want provide to resellers?"
>>
>> What control over domains do they offer that we don't get here?
>> ===
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>>  I-Dotter.com
e> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> =======================================================
>> Sunday, February 23, 2003, 7:42:47 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> SK> Hello Ryan,
>>
>> RB>> I doubt many of you care that someone is coming back to OpenSRS, but
e> I
>> RB>> thought I would send this to the list anyways to help stop anyone
e> thinking
>> RB>> about leaving OpenSRS.
>>
>> SK> Here's different story.
>>
>> SK> First of all, I want say that it was pleasure to work with
>> SK> OpenSRS two years ago. Young and enthusiastic team, changes
>> SK> to SRS on the fly, simple client. But things changed over
>> SK> two years.
>>
>> SK> Since v.2.?? client became unmanageable. You can use it as is,
>> SK> or it's much easier to build your own from scratch, even
>> SK> if all you need is translate messages. Raised response time
>> SK> of support... And since beginning - lack of control. Customers
>> SK> just do not understand, why if you sold them domain, email
>> SK> service and hosting, why you can't do simple change of admin
>> SK> email. Sometimes it's too hard to explain this to person,
>> SK> who don't know exactly what browser is.
>>
>> SK> So a while ago we switched to other registrar. First we didn't
>> SK> consider them as replacement for OpenSRS, we needed domains,
>> SK> which OpenSRS do not offer. And surprisingly they have very
>> SK> good and fast support team with qualified tech personnel, simple
>> SK> API (6 pages, 30 pages with detailed examples, working manage
>> SK> interface was build by one programmer in three days), very
>> SK> interesting and simple daemon-based access to their system and
>> SK> total, absolute control over domains for reseller. Total - we
>> SK> allowed to delete domains, decline transfer requests and verify
>> SK> incoming transfers, not mention ability change every bit in
>> SK> contacts and nameservers. Control is so total, that sometimes it
>> SK> hurts - i.e. registrar do not send renewal messages to registrant,
>> SK> so you have care about this yourself and so on. That was exactly
>> SK> what we needed. Price wasn't real reason, $7.80 per domain was
>> SK> just a nice bonus, we'll going to switch to them even with $15
>> SK> per domain. Real reason was control over domain - only one thing
>> SK> that OpenSRS can't or don't want provide to resellers.
>> SK> Don't ask me who's this registrar, it's not appropriate to advert
>> SK> him in this list.
>>
>> SK> All I want to say - sometimes price isn't reason why peoples
>> SK> leave OpenSRS. There are other, much more important factors.
>>

Reply via email to