Huh? Just what don't I get here? You think I'm against the drop market? That's nonsense. I love it. Defend it.
What I'm suggesting here is that Tucows engage in the drop market in a way that empowering users, rather that simply extract maximum value for themselves as does Pool, Snap, and Enom. What ever happened to loyality? You realize that Enom already has a high bidder at the drop, yet they continue the auction afterwards to ensure THEY gain maximum benefits. Who are they REALLY thinking of? Loren JB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yea right... I think TUCOWS should stay out of the drop market. It will > "empower" to many citizens to join the fishfry and drive up the prices. > > Welcome to capitalism. > > > > Loren Stocker wrote: > > > This, too, is self-serving. Like Pool, "two or more bidders" enter a > private > > auction after enom grabs the bait. Like Lemmings, they are, all driving into > > the "Pool.com" > > > > What I like to see is a service that EMPOWERS users, rather than yet another > > service designed to extract maximum revenues at the expense of convenience. > > > > Best, Loren > > >
