On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:55:37PM -0400, Eric Chadbourne wrote: > Hopefully this will provide some clues. Note that I currently have > the server set up as one to one nat. I've tried a bunch of other > configurations but this one appears to function as desired. The > server has ufw enabled to allow port 80.
If it functions as desired, then what is the problem? You've been told by multiple people that one-to-one NAT is not going to work correctly. _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
