Under democracy, citizens are prohibited from seizing power by force and imposing a military dictatorship on their fellow citizens. Under anarchy, citizens are not so prohibited.
The equivalent CDDL-type argument would be that anarchy is "more free" because you're not prohibited from taking away everyone else's freedom. It strikes me as absurd to claim that a system that fails to protect freedom is somehow "more free". On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Rich Pieri <richard.pi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 16:30:01 +0000 > "Edward Ned Harvey (blu)" <b...@nedharvey.com> wrote: > > > This means you can't build a monolithic linux kernel including zfs in > > it. But you can, if you want to, build a module which the linux > > kernel links to. That is - if it's possible to build a kernel module > > without compiling any of the linux kernel code into the module. > > Or, you distribute the source code under the appropriate license and > use DKMS to automate module builds. Debian and RHEL plus its > derivatives use DMKS to build the OpenAFS kernel modules which are > distributed under the IBM Public License -- free but incompatible with > the GPL, same as the CDDL. > > The only major reason why this hasn't happened to ZFS is because the > Linux kernel port is incomplete. > > -- > Rich P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix PGP KeyID: 32A492D8 / Email: abre...@gmail.com PGP FP: 7834 AEC2 EFA3 565C A4B6 9BA4 0ACB AD85 32A4 92D8 _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss