> From: discuss-bounces+blu=nedharvey....@blu.org [mailto:discuss-
> bounces+blu=nedharvey....@blu.org] On Behalf Of Mike Small
> 
> "systemd handles a lot of annoying infrastructure for you; for example,
> you do not have to arrange to daemonize programs you run."
> 
> I don't understand this at all. Aren't daemons written as daemons
> (giving up controlling terminal and whatever else within their own
> code).

Traditional daemons are, because the programmers *had* *no* *other* *choice.*  
Besides the complexity of actually daemonizing and figuring out how to hook up 
to a logging facility and manipulate the probably nonstandard running 
environment, the developer needs to debug their app, so they *also* make it 
able to run in console mode, and figure out how to manage running in both 
modes, in both environments.  

But if you want to create something new, the ability to daemonize 
any-random-command is a really nice convenience factor; you just write any 
simple console application or shell script, and it behaves exactly the same on 
your command terminal as it does when you make it a service under systemd.


> "because it actively tracks unit status, conditional restarts are not
> dangerous; it shares this behavior with any competently implemented
> active init system."
> 
> Don't understand this. What's a conditional restart and why is it
> dangerous? What's the difference between an active and passive init
> system?

A passive system is like /etc/init.d scripts, which brainlessly do as they're 
told when they're told, and don't make any decisions.  If something like mysqld 
dies, it will not automatically come back up.  An active system will notice 
mysqld died, recognize that it's not supposed to do that right now, and restart 
it.  I know SMF will try to restart a failed service some configurable 
threshold number of times in a configurable threshold period of time, and if 
the service continually fails, then the service gets disabled.  I assume 
something similar exists for systemd.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to