1) Gnu/Linux distros generally don’t “flake out”. Maybe some dev on Fedora might ignore proprietary drivers and cause issues but that can be overcome. Nothing flakes out in the last few years on my boxes. I have gotten OS X to crash a few times. Today I put a 2GB file in the iCloud drive directory and my whole desktop stopped functioning until the file was uploaded. Browser wouldn’t even to to google.com. Activity monitor said Safari was doing something, the gods know what. But I can understand if your milage varies.
2) Sure Xcode is better than eclipse. I never, ever, liked that. Yuck! Slow bloated ugly turd. Hell netbeans was better back in the day. Used it a few times and ran. As a side note I read through much of the Swift documentation and it looks like an interesting language. Too bad it runs only runs on apple. 3) Yeah the Apple guys have been complaining about the latest version of OS X. The last time I used an Apple product was in junior high school in the ‘80s. Apple 2c. 10 ? eric is cool. 20 goto 10. Such fun. Floppies the size of pancakes. Yosemite feels like a toy to me compared to Ubuntu. Not even close in functionality. Marketing is strong! 4) "fight with OS configurations to work” I’m curious as to what? My 8 and 10 year old nieces own a mac, win 7, and ubuntu pc’s and use them all easily for most tasks. Of course if you’re using Win or Mac specific tools… 5) " Lately I run a mix of Debian and Ubuntu and package management is a pain and only getting worse” Really!? The vomit of non-package management on the mac is better than apt-get? Oh my lord you jest! On gnu/linux I can type two lines at terminal and be up to date. Can’t do that on mac / win. I suspect you did something very wrong somewhere. I have had no issues with package management on linux since apt-get / yum and using repos correctly. Nevertheless I can’t comment on, "The documentation and awareness for packages needed to just build 32 bit on x86 is itself remarkably poor” as I haven’t had to do that. 6) "I also think Docker is pretty cool, with additional integration it could replace current package management since everything could be within the container.” Oh no! Docker replacing apt-get makes me cringe. Are you trolling me!?! ;) Why won’t they try to be secure first. And if we need that functionality BSD has had jails for ages. Docker != apt-get != jails. Maybe in the future docker will be more interesting. I don’t care how important RedHat’s marketing arm thinks it is. I do love their hardware. It is art. Software is poop. Evil, manipulative, poorly made poop. Damn I should have purchased a system76 box instead of this! — Eric Chadbourne > On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:54 PM, Dr. Anthony Gabrielson > <agabriels...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Hi Eric, > > I like OS X because it works for me. The OS is long term stable and doesn’t > begin to flake out after a year+ of development. I do not need to focus on > installing software and getting things that should work out of the box to > just work. I also really like Xcode - it is much nicer than Eclipse which > generally feels like a toy to me. This is not to say that Apple’s software > has remained as stable it was in years past. OS X 10.10 crashes about as > often as Linux for me these days - 10.6 was significantly more stable. > > I like Linux but for the most part I have greater issues with it and often > need to fight for functionality - namely it doesn’t just work. This problem > is magnified by staff members new to linux - they always need to fight with > OS configurations to work. Personally, having to fight for functionality > worked when I was younger, but I have higher expectations today. Lately I run > a mix of Debian and Ubuntu and package management is a pain and only getting > worse. For instance, after about a year one Debian box got progressively > worse (after significant development) and needed to be completely rebuilt. At > that time apt refused to install packages. Personally, I think ELF needs to > evolve to address some of these issues - namely default support for multiple > architectures would be really nice. The documentation and awareness for > packages needed to just build 32 bit on x86 is itself remarkably poor. > > I can give Linux a few pluses. Cross compiler setup has gotten much easier in > the last five years or so and a few good ones are even in the Ubuntu repos. I > also think Docker is pretty cool, with additional integration it could > replace current package management since everything could be within the > container. > > With that said, to each their own. I’m sure Ubuntu will run great on the mini. > > Anthony > >> On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:50 PM, Anthony Gabrielson <agabriel...@icloud.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Eric, >> >> I like OS X because it works for me. The OS is long term stable and doesn’t >> begin to flake out after a year+ of development. I do not need to focus on >> installing software and getting things that should work out of the box to >> just work. I also really like Xcode - it is much nicer than Eclipse which >> generally feels like a toy to me. This is not to say that Apple’s software >> has remained as stable it was in years past. OS X 10.10 crashes about as >> often as Linux for me these days - 10.6 was significantly more stable. >> >> I like Linux but for the most part I have greater issues with it and often >> need to fight for functionality - namely it doesn’t just work. This problem >> is magnified by staff members new to linux - they always need to fight with >> OS configurations to work. Personally, having to fight for functionality >> worked when I was younger, but I have higher expectations today. Lately I >> run a mix of Debian and Ubuntu and package management is a pain and only >> getting worse. For instance, after about a year one Debian box got >> progressively worse (after significant development) and needed to be >> completely rebuilt. At that time apt refused to install packages. >> Personally, I think ELF needs to evolve to address some of these issues - >> namely default support for multiple architectures would be really nice. The >> documentation and awareness for packages needed to just build 32 bit on x86 >> is itself remarkably poor. >> >> I can give Linux a few pluses. Cross compiler setup has gotten much easier >> in the last five years or so and a few good ones are even in the Ubuntu >> repos. I also think Docker is pretty cool, with additional integration it >> could replace current package management since everything could be within >> the container. >> >> With that said, to each their own. I’m sure Ubuntu will run great on the >> mini. >> >> Anthony >> >>> On Feb 11, 2015, at 8:22 PM, Eric Chadbourne <eric.chadbou...@icloud.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I’ve been using a mac mini for the last few months and I must say the >>> hardware is nice but the software is pretty bad. Push notifications in >>> Safari (yuck), iCloud hiccuped when I moved from gmail to protonmail, >>> iCloud can’t backup by directory by default, the default email client is >>> very slow, their Xcode IDE is merely adequate, their server products blow, >>> you really can’t change the look significantly, by default it can’t read >>> many other file system formats, case insensitive terminal, iTunes can’t >>> read free codecs, etc. I am very unimpressed with the software. With so >>> much cash behind them one would think they could write good code but no. >>> It really sucks. My Ubuntu boxes are so much more stable and have more >>> features. >>> >>> Anybody here like OS X? Why? I’m not trolling. I’m curious. Why would >>> somebody want to use this terrible piece of proprietary poop? >>> >>> Eric C - the one who is googling how to install Ubuntu on a new mac mini. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Discuss mailing list >>> Discuss@blu.org >>> http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >> > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
