> On 3/11/2015 1:13 PM, ma...@mohawksoft.com wrote: >> Yes, please, oh please, put some links that describe "best practices" >> that >> address my "complaints" as there are none that anyone I have ever known > > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zfs+best+practices+memory > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zfs+best+practices+database > http://lmgtfy.com/?q=zfs+best+practices+sparse+volumes
Again, like I said, these do not address the problems. Specifically, the post about sparse volumes says nothing about how to keep a ZFS pool from growing out of control on a sparse presented to it from a SAN. It merely says give ZFS whole disks, which is stupid. The performance "best practice" show how to improve performance on ZFS, but not how to make the performance on ZFS equivalent to much thinner volume management. ZFS has a lot of good qualities for a number of applications, but it is just bad for a lot of other applications. > > Was that so hard? Yes, because it didn't have any usable information. > > -- > Rich P. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss@blu.org > http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@blu.org http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss