FWIW

"...Canonical, creator of Ubuntu, isn't even cited once in the Linux 
Foundation's report as [a significant source of 
patches](https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=author&q=@canonical.com).
 This actually isn't news to those who have followed Canonical for some time..."

https://www.infoworld.com/article/2610207/open-source-software/who-writes-linux--corporations--more-than-ever.html

Eric

On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Bill Ricker <bill.n1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 12, 2018, 11:46 Eric Chadbourne <sillystr...@protonmail.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> Ubuntu doesn’t or at least didn’t contribute upstream in funds or or code.
>
> Regarding code, I do not believe that to be literally true. Hoarding patches 
> for internal use is foolish at best, and a GPL violation if distributed.
> (They have been 'guilty' of not releasing all their new code - e.g. open-core 
> with proprietary value-adds - but everyone does that, and it's not 'upstream' 
> if they invented it, it's just releasing. If they invent and release 
> something, and Debian adopts it, then they are the upstream to Debian for 
> that.)
>
> Regarding funds, has Ubuntu ever achieved profitability? (If so how and 
> when?) If not so, why would anyone expect them to send Mark's money elsewhere?
>
>> I too have been FreeBSD curious.
>
> *BSD is great for servers. As a "former" Security type, I respect OpenBSD's 
> commitment to security out of the Box. A recent client had a mix of Centos 
> and *BSD servers, worked fine. I might have notes to remind me whether it was 
> FreeBSD or OpenBSD.
>
> What I'm curious about is which *BSD has good APCI support? I do want my 
> laptop to act like a laptop. One advantage of Commercial distros - Ubuntu and 
> RedHat - is they test new big brand laptops early. (OTOH I really prefer 
> older Lenovos now, so maybe that matters less for me now?) Or should I give 
> up and embrace Darwin/BSD (aka MacOSX) for the laptop?
>
>>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss@blu.org
http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to