On Mon, 23 Sep 2019 11:56:48 -0500 Derek Martin <[email protected]> wrote:
> So I lied, I do see a way: If you choose to read in the worst > possible unstated intentions of the person making the statements. > This is unfortunately a tactic that has become commonplace in recent > years. Then you get the interpretation that you have taken. Or the way that you seem to be directly avoiding: confusion. RMS wrote two things which appear contradictory: Epstein was a serial rapist. Sexual assault presumes the application of force or violence. Huh? So if Minsky or Epstein did not apply force or violence then it wasn't sexual asasult or rape? -- Rich Pieri _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
