On Nov 7, 2013, at 4:02 AM, Christine Caulfield <[email protected]> wrote:
> What you have should be fine with the addition of "wait_for_all: 1". You > probably don't auto_tie_breaker unless there is a likelihood of a 2+2 split > on the network. > > "two_node" means you have exactly 2 nodes in the cluster (not ever more) so > isn't relevant and allow_downscale is solving a different problem than you > have. > > With last_man_standing the cluster will survive being degraded to 1 node > provided there is not a large outage and more than 2 nodes fail at a time. Thank you, Chrissie! ‘corosync-quorumtool’ now reports that my cluster is quorate down to a single node with some quick testing. Pacemaker (1.1.10+git20130802-1ubuntu1), however, seems to be ignoring Corosync’s assertion that the cluster quorate with a single node. ./JRH
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
