Hi Benjamin,

great collection :-)

Am Dienstag, den 05.10.2010, 07:38 -0400 schrieb Benjamin Horst:
> I agree that overthinking and overburdening a wiki with rigid process is 
> harmful, but some upfront organization and planning is still necessary.

Yes, rigid processes are harmful for a wiki - even if they want to
achieve something good. But as you already point out, I'd like to guide
some people initially, to not get lost. If one doesn't find information,
then it is like nobody ever published it :-\

> Some major sections that could be defined in the wiki:
> 
> - Site Home (why not use the wiki for the main part of the site, including 
> the homepage and download page?)
> - Documentation (bring this dynamic and enthusiastic group back home to the 
> main site)
> - Development (public planning and release schedule)
> - Community Council (private section, if desired)
> - News

Just a question: Do you expect news to be in the Wiki, or on the rather
website? Or both?

> - Events
> - Marketing and Advocacy
> - Design and Artwork 
> - Teams and Projects

By the way, I really like the idea of Special Interest Groups at Fedora.

> - More?

Most presumably yes :-) So thanks for the great start!


> Adding to Christoph's list of other project wikis:
> 
> * Mozilla
>   https://wiki.mozilla.org/Main_Page
>
> * Ubuntu
>   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/

Interesting, Ubuntu seems to separate the official Documentation (Wiki)
and the "do the work" wiki.

> * Foswiki
>   http://foswiki.org/Home/WebHome

Mmh, din't knew that. Thanks!


Benjamin, thanks for the comments ... most appreciated!

Christoph


> > Cheers,
> > 
> > just my 2 Cents:
> > 
> > On Monday 04 October 2010 23:54, Christoph Noack wrote:
> > 
> >> ...
> >> Step forward, and share your thoughts,
> >> too, please! But how to get started ... I mean ... without a wiki to
> >> document the statements.
> > 
> > A wiki is a wiki is a wiki - so just set one up and let it 
> > self-organize. Do not define too much contstraints in advance. 
> > 
> > Do not define too special rules in beforehead but rather let them 
> > evolve.
> > 
> > People in free projects tend to be very constructive, so let them do 
> > their work.
> > 
> > The final decision which wiki engine to take should be made by the 
> > prospective core admins (as they will have to handle it). A bad engine 
> > with a good admin is far better than a good engine with a poor admin.
> > 
> > Rules should be made only _after_ a certain period of experience. And 
> > they should be defined by the users of the wiki. 
> > 
> > All that said, I'd prefere to have a wiki farm for different languages 
> > and not one multilanguage wiki - just to enhance usability (mainly the 
> > search function). 
> > 
> > Nino
> > -- 
> > To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to 
> > discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
> > All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
> > deleted.
> > List archives are available at 
> > http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
> > 
> 
> 
> Benjamin Horst
> bho...@mac.com
> 646-464-2314 (Eastern)
> www.solidoffice.com
> 


-- 
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to 
discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be 
deleted.
List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/

Reply via email to