On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 07:28:01 +1000 Jean Hollis Weber <jeanwe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 14:38 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am 08.10.2010 um 10:13 schrieb Friedrich Strohmaier: > > > > >> I believe this should be prevented. I just found in docs that > > >> there > > is > > >> a SPAMMODE option: > > >> http://mhonarc.org/MHonArc/doc/resources/spammode.html > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > Honestly, I disagree. Hiding mail addresses really doesn't help > > that much, and to me, the disadvantages (like being unable to > > contact someone directly from the archives) are larger than the > > advantages you think it has. > > > > I'm happy to switch if the majority wants that, but honestly, it > > doesn't help a bit. It's simply worth NOTHING. > > > > Florian > > > I agree with Florian that hiding addresses doesn't help much, Sorry, I really don't understand why you think it doesn't help. Does it not prevent spammers from collecting my email address? I made very different experiences. Email addresses exposed on web pages got a lot of spam over the time whereas other addresses where I was careful not to show them in clear text were spared. > and the disadvantages are greater (for me). Which disadvantages? As had been explained in an earlier mail it is still possible to contact the email owner from the archives and in your inbox you see the full address anyhow. > I vote to leave the lists as they are. I'm against it. At least I want to better understand first why hiding the addresses does not help. > But we do need to add to the warning on the signup page. Too late for me... Manfred -- To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted. List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
