Hi all, On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Carlos Jose Lenarts Ramis < [email protected]> wrote:
> 2010/10/19 Gianluca Turconi <[email protected]> > > > In data 19 ottobre 2010 alle ore 14:35:45, Carlos Jose Lenarts Ramis < > > [email protected]> ha scritto: > > > > > > If wee want a really customizable UI the best way is to go to something > >> like > >> Mocilla XULL adapted to LibO > >> > > > > I know people who would kill because of XUL slowness in Moz UI. :) > > -- > > Gianluca Turconi > > > > > > -- > > E-mail to > > [email protected]<discuss%[email protected]> > <discuss%[email protected]<discuss%[email protected]>>for > instructions on how to unsubscribe > > List archives are available at > > http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > > All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot > be > > deleted > > > > > The slowness is not from XUL as user interface is that all the application > is written in XUL+JavaScript. > > -- > E-mail to > [email protected]<discuss%[email protected]>for > instructions on how to unsubscribe > List archives are available at > http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ > All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > Isn't it better to use a native toolkit and to load the theme on runtime? Of course, some customization capabilities would be lost, but we won't be adding rather large dependence of XULRunner (which is, at least on my system, as large as entire widget toolkit). Povilas -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
