On 11/20/2010 2:30 AM, Ron Faile wrote:
>NoOP is right, I wrote the quoted text. Your explanation is well
>noted and I can see the reasoning behind it. The sooner we can change
>the interface and feel of LibreOffice then the better, as I for one
>don't want such a Oracle aligning feature as version numbers staring
>me in the face every time I start up my non-proprietary office suite
>
>On 11/20/10, NoOp <gl...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote:
>> Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit :
>>> On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
>>>> As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office
>>>> project
>>>> derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their
version
>>>> numbering system. Wouldn't it be better to start from 1 to
reinforce in
>>>> peoples minds that we are a separate project.
Take a look at the UI improvements page,
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Default_UI_Improvements
I just uploaded a file (item 11) with some ideas that might set LibO
apart. Namely a new menu structure. Would be interested in your comments.
Ron
--
Unsubscribe instructions: Email to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines: http://netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived ***
