On Nov 21, 2010, at 22:31 , jonathon wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 11/21/2010 09:15 PM, James Wilde wrote: > >> ...and? Is LibO going to upgrade the version number every time OOo does? >> And only then? > > Unless there is a "compatibility tag" for extensions, the way that there > is for firefox, LibO is stuck with the version numbering that OOo uses, > if it wants to retain compatibility with those extensions. > Well, I appreciate that it would mean two sets of numbers for extensions, but I can imagine that, in a not too distant future, OOo and LibO are going to grow apart, possibly sufficiently that an extension for the one will not work with the other. Why not accept that from day 1?
//James -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://www.documentfoundation.org/lists/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
