On 2011-01-02 12:20 PM, Craig A. Eddy wrote: > I don't think LO could implement the writing of OOXML in ANY format that > would be compatible to MS. And to try to do so would simply imply that > LO was broken (in MS's words, anyway).
What are you talking about? As has been pointed out numerous times, LibO *already* *does* write OOXML. I'm glad you're not the decision maker... -- Best regards, Charles -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
