Hi Robert, *, I'm not very deep involved in spellchecking, but nevertheless trying a shot..
Robert Derman schrieb: > RGB ES wrote: >> AFAIK, LibO dictionaries are the same dictionaries from OOo. If you >> have a custom dictionary where you added the words you miss, you can >> "import" (I mean, copy to the right location) that dictionary into >> LibO user profile. See here for more details about the user profile: >> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile >> 2011/2/20 Robert Derman <robert.der...@pressenter.com> : >>> One of the reasons, perhaps the main reason I have not upgraded to >>> LO from OpenOffice 3.1 yet is that I dread having to go through the >>> process of adding over a thousand compound words to the spellcheck >>> dictionary. This dictionary has almost NO compound words in it! >>> Does anyone know if this problem has been addressed with LO 3.3. I >>> am using the U.S. English version. If this severe shortcoming has >>> not yet been addressed yet, I think we should do so before version >>> 3.4. If I remember well german, dictionary changed to hunspell dictionary engine for that reason. German and many more languages' words are compound words in a very wide range so that problem arose from beginning. Not shure what spellchecking engine is used for english languages spellchecking - I guess it's aspell which has poor support for compound words. But all guessed. Not enough insight in that topic. [.. impact of poor spellchecking ..] Gruß/regards -- Friedrich Libreoffice-Box http://libreofficebox.org/ LibreOffice and more on CD/DVD images (german version already started) -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
