On 2011-03-29 14:25, Michel Gagnon wrote: > Le 2011-03-28 15:29, aqualung a écrit : >> Jaime R. Garza wrote: >>> In my opinion Must, Should, Could, Completely Irrelevant: >>> >>> - *Must*: RTF >>> - *Must*: MS Office 97/2000/XP Binary >>> - *Completely Irrelevant*: MS Office 2003 XML >>> - *Should*: OOXML ECMA-376 / ISO/IEC 29500 Transitional >>> - *Must*: OOXML ISO/IEC 29500 Strict >>> >>> Cheers! >>> >>> Jaime >>> >>> >> Which one of the above is the .docx file extension produced by MS Office >> 2007 and 2010? That one is the most important of all IMHO. > > I also agree that Ms Office 2010 format is coming more and more common > and should be a *MUST*. > On the other hand, RTF seems so bastard that basic support is probably > ok. > Should the list be broken into READ WRITE. It might be that a condition exists such as *must* READ MS Office 2003 XML, *Completely Irrelevant*: WRITE MS Office 2003 XML.
-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
