On Mon, 2011-04-25 at 11:17 +0200, CaStarCo wrote: > 2011/4/25 Italo Vignoli <italo.vign...@gmail.com> > > > On 04/25/2011 08:59 AM, todd rme wrote: > > > > Sounds like latex > >> > > > > Apart from discussions on the characteristics of the file format, ebooks > > are definitely outside the scope of The Document Foundation. There are > > already several organizations working around ebooks, and taking care of the > > related problems. > >
<snip> > > Wich organizations? I think that if we have to trust that these > organizations will innovate we are going to wait a very long time. I know > that I am not a guru and not and expert, but I think that this work is not > impossible.. then, why the actual ebooks are that set of static crap? why > it's so difficult to make technic books for ebook readers? the usage of > semantic data is restricted in a very poor set of cases... and the > "standard" format EPUB is very Spartan. > <snip> > I was writting to the OpenDocument Foundation Close - but not quite - this is a list for The Document Foundation. The OpenDocument standard is overseen by a different organization, OASIS - http://www.oasis-open.org/ > because i thought it was a > little more than LibreOffice... It's only LibreOffice? I hope that it will be eventually. Thanks Drew Jensen -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
