Hi *, On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Andras Timar <tima...@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] > This was the first time when Rainer joined to our call. He does a > tremendous job with bug triaging and QA. He wants to contact most active > bugzilla users and coordinate their work. The problem is that we have > many unconfirmed bugs and incomplete bug reports.
Actually only 30 unconfirmed ones (well, those that use the unconfirmed state). I don't know who would have the rights to do so, but enforcing unconfirmed state for non-developer/non-qa people might make sense to get a better overview. > Those may be blockers, > but they have to be confirmed and they have to be reproducible. > freedesktop bugzilla does not support the NEEDINFO status (we need to > find a workaround, I guess...) No, that's not quite correct. OOo had a needmoreinfo keyword, not a needmoreinfo status - And fdo bugzilla has a NEEDINFO keyword, so pretty much the same. The big difference was that only people with special IZ permissions could promote an issue from unconfirmed state to new state. fdo bugzilla even has the NEEDINFO bug status - but that rather is the final resolution after there was no response after a while (like closing the issue as worksforme or invalid in OOo's IssueZilla) The first step would be to make use of Unconfirmed state, then QA-volunteers can direct their efforts to those that have not yet been reviewed. ciao Christian -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
