> Think harder. The point is that if a Release Candidate build is determined > to be > good *enough* to be released, the *exact* *same* *bits* will become the > release > then instead. Just the names of the download directories, downloadable > file, etc > are changed as necessary. So if the Help:About would say RC2, and RC2 would > be > turned into a release, then the release would also say RC2. Which would be > confusing, wouldn't it? > > It's not a matter of thinking harder. The program I'm used to that uses Release Candidates simply changes the version number (even if no changes are made to the code). So RC2 is build 7599 and the OEM is 7600. But for the user what matters is that one shows in the About box as RC2 and the other as Final.
I know that makes no sense for developers but the About box is for the users... so it should be user friendly ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RC2-no-3-4-0-x-tag-in-help-about-libreoffice-tp2994857p3000082.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
