On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote: > > On 4 Jun 2011, at 19:06, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ian Lynch <ianrly...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I should think there is probably >>> broader commercial or legal reason for Oracle to hold on to the copyright >>> such as tax relief or just in case it *might* somehow become valuable. >> >> Oracle offered to transfer the copyright, and I said that it was >> neither necessary nor required. What was required was a standard >> Software Grant. Once that was provided neither side has pursued it >> any further. > > Can you also clarify the disposition of the trademarks please, Sam?
Incomplete at this time. I will have more to say when I have something concrete to report. > S. - Sam Ruby -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
