On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 13:54, Florian Effenberger > <flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: >>... >> That point has been repeaded over and over again, but basically you are >> saying everyone "Do not set up your own foundation at all, we alreadyh have >> enough."
(FWIW I aimed - but probably failing - to be much more nuanced) > I don't know that Robert B-D said that, or anybody else. *I* certainly > said it, and strongly believe it. But that's just me :-) I believe that setting up a new upstream Foundation to play with major corporations with a new governance model, IP system and legal framework is difficult and unrewarding work best avoided where possible. (It's a PITA. Given a choice, I would have preferred to spend much less of my life on it...) Given the donation to Apache, TDF could opt to focus on development downstream of the ASF cloning the well known GPLv3 distributed development model with copyright assigned to the FSF. Most problems (with major corporations players, IP or whatever) that the TDF community didn't want to handle right away could then be pushed upstream to the ASF or the FSF. Less risk and more freedom for the TDF. >> Besides, the currently existing association has a governance model, is >> non-profit and donations are tax-deductible. > > Ah! I didn't know that the current sponsor enabled that. Good stuff. +1 > I had thought you were further away... That's the impression I had from an early post here as well... Robert -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted