Hi, 2011/6/6 Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: > On Jun 6, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote: >> 2011/6/6 Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldon...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> Until the TDF has taken that last step, expect to be challenged about >>> your readiness ;-) >>> >>> I'd like to take up your offer :-) >>> >>> But here on this list and on the understanding that we're trying to >>> work together to assess for the public record how close the TDF is >>> >> TDF is so near that it had offered help to Oracle last month: >> http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/06/publishing-our-recommendation-to-oracle/ >> > > Good to see the list... Not knowing things for sure, but I > would guess that Oracle had issues with #3, which gave away > (what I would expect to be) huge chunks of h/w infrastructure, > esp to an entity which was still in the process (though close!) > of finalizing its foundational status... > I think you have misread that. There was no question for getting any infrastructure or hardware. Just the possiblity to _transfer_ the content of wikis/web etc. This is the same as with ASF now. And you oversee (as many) that there is an interim legal entity, the "Freies Office Deutschland e.V.".
Volker -- Volker Merschmann Member of The Document Foundation http://www.documentfoundation.org -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
