Florian Effenberger wrote > Happy Birthday, Document Foundation! Congratulations from my side, too! It's a pleasure to watch TDF grow and prosper.
But with TDF leaving its infancy, and a new board stepping up to continue the success story, maybe it's time to share a thought or two about the future. For me, there's two key points within TDF: First is independence, the way the foundation is set up, the hard-coded mixture rules for TDF's bodies, the democratic process, the donation-only funding (combined with a careful financial planning and only-spend-what-you-have attitude). Especially when I look at the other big non-profit entity aiming at software for end users, Mozilla, I get the strong gut feeling (without doing deeper research) that this independence is pure gold, and needs to be preserved no matter the cost. The second point is transparency, which is key for building the trust necessary to make donation-based funding models work, and therefore is key for TDF's independence, too. I'm not only talking about transparency of the decision-making process here, but also about financial transparency, development transparency, and so forth. And while TDF is already strong at both independence and transparency, it could still be better. So I suggest the following things: 1) Official statement of affiliation by every member of any official body of TDF, if there's none already present. 2) TDF becoming a member of the "Initiative Transparente Zivilgesellschaft" by Transparency Deutschland e. V., adhering to its 10-point code of conduct. [1] Having said that, I also think that TDF should broaden its scope of software development to truly "free" the desktop. In its values, it is stated that TDF commits to "eliminate the digital divide in society by giving everyone access to office productivity tools free of charge to enable them to participate as full citizens in the 21st century". Personally, I think that things like a browser, email client, and personal information manager should also be considered as being "office productivity tools", and therefore should be offered by TDF in the long run, too. This is even more true when I look at the current market for these kinds of software. I've read many times that the one big thing missing from OOo/LO is an Outlook replacement, which would be a combined email client/PIM thingie. And with Mozilla going into development directions that I call ambiguous at best, the question about which browser to use on Windows could be hard to answer in the not too distant future. So, two years of TDF is surely a time to celebrate, but probably also a time for discussing the course to a future even brighter. All the best, Jens Mildner [1] http://www.transparency.de/Initiative-Transparente-Zivilg.1612.0.html -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Happy-Birthday-TDF-tp4097624p4097906.html Sent from the Discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
