> > Probably they had a really complicated test that was supposed to catch > this, but really complicated tests are themselves buggy. Who tested that > the test catches the failures it is supposed to test? Not the > non-existent QA department… > > > -kb >
It's hilarious because this is literally their excuse, their statement: "Due to a bug in the Content Validator, one of the two Template Instances passed validation despite containing problematic content data," (https://www.cnbc.com/2024/07/24/crowdstrike-says-bug-in-quality-control-process-led-to-botched-update.html) _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@driftwood.blu.org https://driftwood.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
