idee fixe \ee-day-FEEKS\, noun:
An idea that dominates the mind; a fixed idea; an obsession.




i hope i'm not the only one who had to look this up.

kevin



On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Creighton Samuels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steren wrote:
>> I was introduced to the US Free Culture movement earlier this summer.
>> As far as I can see, I totally share your views but when it comes to
>> decisions and actions, I must reckon I'm lost.
>> I think there is a lack of constructive initiative. Obviously, this
>> could change easily starting by this mailing list. There are topics
>> and people have to stick to them.
>>
>> Steren
>> Creative Commons Intern
>> Lyon, France.
>>
>
>
> Well, I've been a mostly lurking member of this list since it's
> foundation, or very nearly it's foundation.  (no, I'm not a founder)  I
> can honestly say that during the early few years, this list was very
> active and very well self directed.  In many ways, as a group we have
> seem to have lost our way.  I don't think that this is due to any one
> person, myself.  I think, perhaps, the movers that have been on this
> list have either dedicated more of their efforts to many other worthy
> causes; or simply burnt out, graduated and moved on.  The problem with
> restricting the flow of information, based on the opinions of the
> readers instead of the posters, is that this list would then become the
> same kind of structured system that this list exists to combat.  I'm not
> sure which would be worse for this cause, a regulated forum of ideas, or
> a bazaar of ideas with a very high noise to signal ratio.  Posts
> requesting that members self regulate are one thing, advocating
> regulations upon the freedom of speech of the membership something else
> altogether.  Certainly, the noise can be annoying and counterproductive,
> but I don't think anyone who truly believes in Free Culture, the
> Creative Commons, and the worthy collection of works that share the
> FSF's licenses could function for long within a forum that limited what
> *they* considered to be relevant enough to post.  Most would either go
> independent, or fork a list more to their own liking.  Either way, the
> end result would be the division of forces and breakdown of goodwill
> between two like minded camps.
>
> Kinda like a church split, gives everyone a bad taste.
>
> Creighton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>



-- 
)_)_)_)_)_)_
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to