> Creighton Samuels wrote:
>> I think you have missed my point.  It is a choice that the list
>> membership *can* make, individually, without affecting the list
>> membership in any other fashion.  If *he* annoys you, killfile him and
>> he will cease to exist for you.  If he annoys everyone, he will cease to
>> exist entirely.  No rules, committees, or offensive actions required.
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>


I think that I'm still being misunderstood...


> I hope that people have been doing what you suggest thus far with people
> they don't want to read. I assume that is how most mailing lists are
> read.  Read what you want, don't read what you don't want.
>
> I think some people felt they weren't able to be effective members of
> the mailing list by not reading entire weeks of email (which is what
> would happen if people killfiled certain topics).
>

I'm not talking about actively filtering groups of posts by subject
header, every email client has a file for which any post that arrives from
an email address listed is automaticly deleted, no operator input
required.  Every email list I have ever been on (I average about 250-300
emails received daily) forwards the sender's address, in part, for proper
killfile operation.  Any post from a disruptive individual listed in the
killfile will never be seen in any fashion by the reader, regardless of
topic.

> So yeah, I agree that ideally people should just ignore what they don't
> want to read.  But, I also see how some people feel it has gotten out of
> hand (certain discussions at least).
>
> Anyways, I think we agree in principle, I just might be more willing to
> have groups set group specific guidelines.  It is a trade-off though,
> certainly.  And I don't profess know how to handle the situation in the
> *best* fashion.
>


I think we are not far off, and I'm not opposed to "guidelines" in any
case, provided that they are not rigid.  It's just the part about
"enforcement" of guidelines that I am warning against.  Personally, it's
not likely to affect me either way, as generally I'm a passive lurker
anyway.

Creighton

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to