thirded. I was under the impression the unwillingness to license FairPlay is what gave them that dominance. Now that they have the market perhaps they decided that it was simply a good time to ditch the now useless FairPlay. (especially in light of Amazon's growing sales in the field)
Apple's move isn't altruistic for the purpose of altruism. It is capitalizing on a momentum of DRM hatred among consumers by symbolically discarding a now useless appendage of their software strategy. Not only are they riding a lot of free press but they are profiting on the conversion of the DRM'd -> MP3. Quoting Elizabeth Stark <[email protected]>: > Indeed, and I second Conley's nomination. > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Fred Benenson <[email protected]>wrote: > > > One could argue that unwillingness to license FairPlay was a strategic move > > in and of itself -- Apple using DRM against itself. > > > > > > ~ ~ ~ > > thoughts / http://fredbenenson.com/blog > > work / http://creativecommons.org > > sights / http://flickr.com/fcb > > sounds / http://www.last.fm/user/mecredis > > status / http://twitter.com/mecredis > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Elizabeth Stark <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> I'm surprised no one has brought this up, but I think Apple's lack of > >> willingness to license their "FairPlay" DRM (coupled with the market > >> dominance of iPods) did a lot to help spur on the demise of DRM in the > >> digital music space. No one wanted to sell music that wouldn't work on an > >> iPod, and any other DRM would not have been compatible. Therefore, the > >> answer was unDRMed mp3s (a la Amazon). > >> > >> That said, I don't think Apple was particularly fond of DRM from the > >> get-go anyway, so it's not like they were keen to keep the DRM that the > >> recording industry initially demanded.... > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Kevin Donovan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> > >>> I'm not knowledgeable enough, but I'd be happy to deliver docs, etc and > >>> do leg work in D.C. > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Rich Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> The Justice Department is looking into gaming DRM: > >>>> > >>>> > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20090106-feds-note-gaming-drm-woes-ftc-to-hold-town-hall-meeting.html > >>>> > >>>> And! They're looking for people to be part of the discussion: > >>>> https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-DRMtechnologies/ > >>>> > >>>> Anybody want to rep FC? > >>>> > >>>> Rich > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Discuss mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kevin Donovan > >>> Georgetown '11: SFS > >>> 630.849.8285 > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Discuss mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >>> > >>> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Discuss mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > >> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > > > > _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
