Although Fairey would claim a non-commercial free use over his image, I wonder if the judge would argue that the work was so transformative that it impacted (beyond Fairey's control) the commercial market (aka. others making money off the image, though that of course infringes on Fairey's copyright) in a way that somehow affects the definition of free use.
Alex Alexander Leavitt Boston University 2009 http://alexleavitt.com Twitter: @alexleavitt On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Matt Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Ryan Prior <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Allow me to cast the first stone: http://changeyarly.ytmnd.com/ > > Thanks for the seizure. > > -- > Matt Lee > Free Software, etc. > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
