Issues also may come up if slides have video clips or presenters play songs.
Maybe.

-Adi


On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Parker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Okay, last question:
> re: copyright concerns on actual slide content: say the lecture video
> contains some close-ups of slides and some shots of just the
> professor's head. say that some of the images in the presentation are
> used without permission and don't have an open license that allows the
> speaker's use. say that we want to publish the lecture video but not
> the slides. say that we do so, under cc-by, along with a brief fair
> use claim like: "any other slide content copyright its respective
> creators, used under fair use for noncommercial, educational purposes"
>
> I know I probably won't get real legal advice back, but a
> recommendation, or better yet a statement like "this is what uMich
> does" (if applicable) would rock. thanks!
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Greg Grossmeier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Right, it doesn't explicitly say which license we are going to release
> > the work under because we didn't want to limit ourselves prematurely. If
> > we need to change the license we use for some reason (say, playing a
> > BY-SA song in the background, "syncing" the music and thus invoking the
> > -SA part) then we can. It is implied by the "The University may make
> > copies of the Materials available, consistent with its educational
> > mission, on a free and open basis to the world as Open Educational
> > Resources (OER)" part.
> >
> > As long as what we do is consistent with out OER program then we're ok,
> > with respect to the terms of this contract.
> >
> > Remember, IANAL. But, we did have 2 really good lawyers write this and
> > other lawyers in the GC office reviewed this contract.
> >
> > Greg
> >
> >
> > <quoting name="Parker" date="2010-12-03" time="17:09:14 -0500">
> >> Thanks Greg! It doesn't specifically say anywhere on there something
> like "I
> >> give umich permission to publish the material with the cc-by license."
> Is
> >> this implied by the statement that umich "owns" copies of the material?
> Or
> >> that umich has permission to publish as oer? I guess it'd make sense if
> it
> >> were the latter, but it seems odd to me that this would be enforceable
> >> without citing a specific definition of OER that includes open
> licensing.
> >> But IANAL.
> >>
> >> I'll try to generalize this and then run it by a lawyer and throw it up
> on
> >> the wiki page with the recipe. Then it's showtime!
> >>
> >> http://madebyparker.com
> >> sent from my mobile
> >> On Dec 3, 2010 10:38 AM, "Greg Grossmeier" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hey all,
> >> >
> >> > So, I'm not a lawyer either, but I (and the team at Open.Michigan)
> worked
> >> > with the lawyers at the GC's office at U of Michigan to create the
> >> > attached release form for just this situation.
> >> >
> >> > What this form also gets you is permission to use the accompanying
> >> > materials in the presentation. A typical "I consent to be recorded.."
> >> > form does not. So, this means that you don't have to worry about the
> >> > slides in the background and if you get the slides from them you can
> post
> >> > those as well (barring any other copyright concerns contained within
> the
> >> > slides, like the presenter using 3rd party material that isn't openly
> >> > licensed or fair use).
> >> >
> >> > Feel free to edit it for your needs (just please remove all references
> to
> >> > U of Michigan).
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> >
> >> > Greg
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > <quoting name="Adi Kamdar" date="2010-12-02" time="04:03:01 +0000">
> >> >> IANAL, but I believe all you need is a video release form. These
> usually
> >> >> have statements that say:
> >> >>
> >> >> I consent to be videotaped and to the use of these recordings for X,
> Y, Z
> >> >> (publicity, advertising, to be put online, to be used by the school,
> to
> >> be
> >> >> archived, for educational use, etc... insert whatever specifics or
> vague
> >> >> phrases here)
> >> >>
> >> >> I release (you) from all claims, etc. This is irrevocable. Blah blah.
> >> >>
> >> >> And then they sign and date it.
> >> >>
> >> >> You can put the Creative Commons license and the specific use in the
> >> initial
> >> >> part.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm sure you can find some mock ones on the web, too! Or you can
> email
> >> your
> >> >> school's OGC or media department. I'm sure they have set releases
> that
> >> you
> >> >> can use as templates.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Adi
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Parker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > This week in "CC license your X"...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Preview: I'm looking for stock waivers to give to groups at
> Dartmouth
> >> >> > that they can have lecturers to sign, giving the group permission
> to
> >> >> > release a video of the lecture under a Creative Commons license.
> Help!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > At Dartmouth, several departments, centers, institutes, orgs, etc
> host
> >> >> > guest lectures or public faculty lectures. Many of them record the
> >> >> > lectures and put them up on youtube. This rocks!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I want to make it super incredibly easy for these guys to attach a
> >> >> > Creative Commons license to their lecture videos (CC-BY would be
> >> >> > great, but I'm willing to compromise). I've already talked to a
> couple
> >> >> > of these groups and they're totally on board--they just need help
> with
> >> >> > the execution.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I want to be able to follow this recipe:
> >> >> > * Sit down with a rep from the center/forum/whatever and make the
> case
> >> >> > for using a creative commons license
> >> >> > ** I already feel well-equipped to do that. I'll talk about the
> types
> >> >> > of uses which the center probably wants to allow but which are by
> >> >> > default prohibited by copyright law in the US. I can get tips from
> >> >> > this:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >>
> http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/cclearn-explanations-oer-and-cc-licenses-05-apr-09.pdf
> >> >> > ,
> >> >> > and I can even leave a copy of it with them.
> >> >> > * Propose that they use CC-By, but if they say no, offer to help
> them
> >> >> > choose a different CC license (hopefully with as few restrictions
> as
> >> >> > possible)
> >> >> > ** I feel pretty well-equipped to do this too. I'll look at
> >> >> > http://creativecommons.org/choose/ with them and help them decide
> >> >> > which permissions they're willing to grant. I'll even point them to
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >>
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/FFAQ#Is_use_X_a_violation_of_the_Noncommercial_clause_of_the_licenses.3F
> >> >> > if they're confused about the reach of "noncommercial." I can leave
> >> >> > them a copy of
> >> >> >
> >>
> http://wiki.creativecommons.org/images/a/a4/Creativecommons-how-to-license-poster_eng.pdf
> >> >> > if they want to mull it over or consult someone else.
> >> >> > * This part is key: hand them any waivers that they'll need as well
> as
> >> >> > instructions for how to use them (do both speakers and
> videographers
> >> >> > have to sign it, for example?)
> >> >> > ** I need help with this!
> >> >> > * Finally, hand them a chunk of html that they can put on their
> >> >> > website to articulate the license right next to where they embed
> the
> >> >> > video. It's probably also a good idea to give them some plaintext
> that
> >> >> > they can throw in the description field on their youtube page.
> >> >> > ** This is easy--http://creativecommons.org/choose/ gives it right
> to
> >> you!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I found a lot of awesome material on the CC site, especially at
> >> >> > http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Documentation. But I wasn't able
> to
> >> >> > find the stock waivers that I'm looking for. Help!
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > http://www.madebyparker.com
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > Discuss mailing list
> >> >> > [email protected]
> >> >> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> >> > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> >> [email protected]
> >> >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> >> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > | Greg Grossmeier |
> >> > | http://grossmeier.net |
> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Discuss mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
> >
> >
> > --
> > |       Greg Grossmeier |
> > | http://grossmeier.net |
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.madebyparker.com
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://freeculture.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss
FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss

Reply via email to