I think you're right Rob, I have looked into it a bit more and it seems that they are trying to simplify the license-load. Though I am still frustrated by this, I am curious as to why they have decided to operate this way, as I feel it really limits what they can do.
On 14/03/2011, Asheesh Laroia <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, C. Alaric Moore wrote: > >> So, about making wiki page etc. I have been looking around the "public >> domain" rules, and am seeing that all CC licensed materials can't be >> read for the LibriVox project. Reason being that they [LibriVox] allow >> for commercial uses of their materials. I find this to be particularly >> frustrating, because there are a lot of awesome! materials that can't be >> published in audio form by this group. >> >> So question: Any alternatives? Is it necessary to make an alternative if >> none are found? What are your thoughts on this? > > Well, there are a bunch of Creative Commons licenses that *do* permit > commercial re-use. So maybe those are permissible within Librivox? > > -- Asheesh. > > -- > Q: Why haven't you graduated yet? > A: Well, Dad, I could have finished years ago, but I wanted > my dissertation to rhyme. > -- *Sincerely, Clarissa Alaric Moore* ***405-343-4352 * * * *** * _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
