And Open Library is about books, not journal articles. More likely is: Contacted by e-mail, Swartz declined to comment on what he was planning to > do with the documents. But he pointed to his bio in the Demand Progress > statement, which notes that "in conjunction with Shireen Barday, he > downloaded and analyzed 441,170 law review articles to determine the source > of their funding; the results > werepublished<http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/content/article/punitive-damages-remunerated-research-and-legal-profession> > in > the *Stanford Law Review*." > It's not clear, then, whether this was an attempt to liberate the documents > from behind the JSTOR paywall or whether he was intending to use the > documents for a personal research project.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Richard Kaufman <[email protected]>wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 16:13, Shannon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you read the actual indictment, he actually broke and entered and >> illegally stole information to supply openlibrary.org. Just sayin... >> > > Nowhere I read anything about http://openlibrary.org. Where did you get > that information from? I ctrl-F'd the indictment and found nothing about it. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
