On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > Sage - really? You wouldn't give them either a -BY or a nontransferrable > license for this use? It's a brilliant photo. >
-BY wouldn't have made a difference, as they still would need to indicate the specific license. It seems to be the length / complexity of going that far that they couldn't do. (This is the one: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ragesoss/3835494997/in/photostream/ The one that is most representative of how I remember Aaron, though, is this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/ragesoss/3835498017/in/photostream/ ) I don't know... I guess I've already gotten the chance to explain why the license is important to their photo guy. I'd normally take a hard line with old media. I'll ping him again and say it's fine with just attribution. The photo would be in good company, it seems, with Fred and Cory. -Sage _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freeculture.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss FAQ: http://wiki.freeculture.org/Fc-discuss
