Gonzales proposes new crime: 'Attempted' copyright infringement 
Posted by Declan McCullagh 

Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is pressing the U.S. Congress to enact a 
sweeping intellectual-property bill that would 
increase criminal penalties for copyright infringement, including "attempts" to 
commit piracy. 

"To meet the global challenges of IP crime, our criminal laws must be kept 
updated," Gonzales said during a speech before the 
U.S. Chamber of Commerce in Washington on Monday. 

The Bush administration is throwing its support behind a proposal called the 
Intellectual Property Protection Act of 2007, which is 
likely to receive the enthusiastic support of the movie and music industries, 
and would represent the most dramatic rewrite of 
copyright law since a 2005 measure dealing with prerelease piracy. 

Here's our podcast on the topic. 

The IPPA would, for instance: 

* Criminalize "attempting" to infringe copyright. Federal law currently 
punishes not-for-profit copyright infringement with 
between 1 and 10 years in prison, but there has to be actual infringement that 
takes place. The IPPA would eliminate that 
requirement. (The Justice Department's summary of the legislation says: "It is 
a general tenet of the criminal law that those 
who attempt to commit a crime but do not complete it are as morally culpable as 
those who succeed in doing so.") 

* Create a new crime of life imprisonment for using pirated software. Anyone 
using counterfeit products who "recklessly causes 
or attempts to cause death" can be imprisoned for life. During a conference 
call, Justice Department officials gave the example 
of a hospital using pirated software instead of paying for it. 

* Permit more wiretaps for piracy investigations. Wiretaps would be authorized 
for investigations of Americans who are 
"attempting" to infringe copyrights. 

* Allow computers to be seized more readily. Specifically, property such as a 
PC "intended to be used in any manner" to 
commit a copyright crime would be subject to forfeiture, including civil asset 
forfeiture. Civil asset forfeiture has become 
popular among police agencies in drug cases as a way to gain additional 
revenue, and it is problematic and controversial. 

* Increase penalties for violating the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's 
anticircumvention regulations. Criminal violations are 
currently punished by jail times of up to 10 years and fines of up to $1 
million. The IPPA would add forfeiture penalties. 

* Add penalties for "intended" copyright crimes. Certain copyright crimes 
currently require someone to commit the "distribution, 
including by electronic means, during any 180-day period of at least 10 copies" 
valued at more than $2,500. The IPPA would 
insert a new prohibition: actions that were "intended to consist of" 
distribution. 

* Require Homeland Security to alert the Recording Industry Association of 
America. That would happen when CDs with 
"unauthorized fixations of the sounds, or sounds and images, of a live musical 
performance" are attempted to be imported. 
Neither the Motion Picture Association of America nor the Business Software 
Alliance (nor any other copyright holder, such as 
photographers, playwrights or news organizations, for that matter) would 
qualify for this kind of special treatment. 

A representative of the Motion Picture Association of America told us: "We 
appreciate the department's commitment to 
intellectual-property protection and look forward to working with both the 
department and Congress as the process moves 
ahead." 

What's still unclear is the kind of reception this legislation might encounter 
on Capitol Hill. Gonzales may not be terribly 
popular, but Democrats do tend to be more closely aligned with Hollywood and 
the recording industry than is the GOP. (A few 
years ago, Republicans even savaged fellow conservatives for allying themselves 
too closely with copyright holders.) 

On behalf of Rep. Howard Berman, the California Democrat who heads the House 
Judiciary subcommittee that focuses on 
intellectual property, a representative said the congressman is reviewing 
proposals from the attorney general and others. The 
aide said the Hollywood politician plans to introduce his own 
intellectual-property enforcement bill later this year but that his 
office is not prepared to discuss any details yet. 

One key Republican was less guarded. "We are reviewing (the attorney general's) 
proposal. Any plan to stop IP theft will benefit 
the economy and the American worker," said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the top 
Republican on the House Judiciary 
committee. "I applaud the 
attorney general for recognizing the need to protect intellectual property." 

Still, it's too early to tell what might happen. A similar copyright bill that 
Smith, the RIAA and the Software and Information 
Industry Association enthusiastically supported last April never went anywhere. 

CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this blog.
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.isoc-ny.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to