But not() cannot be called without(), because the counter part would then be with(), and with may be making some trouble with _javascript_s syntax..
2006/9/7, Klaus Hartl <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Francisco Brito schrieb:
> Should $().add() be $().and() instead? It makes more sense if the
> counterpart is "not".
I like that, it's even more readable.
hey, what about not() should become without() ;-)
-- klaus
_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
[email protected]
http://jquery.com/discuss/
--
Paul Bakaus
Web Developer
------------------------
Hildastr. 35
79102 Freiburg
_______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list [email protected] http://jquery.com/discuss/
