There's also good things here: http://www.jsfromhell.com and there: http://dev.rubyonrails.org/browser/spinoffs/prototype/src
Franck. 2006/9/9, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 9/9/06, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > just uploaded a set of extensions to the String object. Until now, there > > is no way yet to generate documentation like it is done with jQuery, > > therefore the presentation is not too interessting. > > You can see the test suite running here: > > http://joern.jquery.com/sandbox/stringTest.html (together with links for > > uncompressed and compressed version). > > All functions have inline documentation with examples. > > > > Does this make any sense at all? Would you consider those extensions usful? > > And, the most interesting question: Would it be a good idea to depend > > jQuery on this, eg. replacing $.trim and therefore making jQuery itself > > smaller? > > > > -- Jörn > > > > P.S.: Coming next, Arrays :-) > > > I also made something like your. > > http://code.google.com/p/jbasicext/ > > > -- > I like python! > My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou > UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad > UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/