While your plugin is slick, there is something of a sacrifice of size for sexyness.
The point of thickbox was functionality whilst maintaining a small code size. It achieved that, and then some. While it's not gorgeous, it still weights in at nearly twice of the size of thickbox (iutil.js+imagebox.js=15+kb),(thickbox.js = 9.44kb). Whether they all play nicely when compressed may even bring more benefits. Don't get me wrong here... I think your imagebox is great, but I don't think thickbox is too complex! Stefan Petre wrote: > > Hi, > > Maybe some of you that migrated from prototype to jQuery miss the Lightbox > plugin. I know I do for some projects. > I know that we have the great Thickbox plugin. But in some situations > thickbox is too complex or not that > slick like Lightbox. > > So, I made a Lightbox replica, named ImageBox > > http://interface.eyecon.ro/develop/demos/imagebox.html > > _______________________________________________ > jQuery mailing list > discuss@jquery.com > http://jquery.com/discuss/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ImagaBox-plugin-tf2270807.html#a6307821 Sent from the JQuery forum at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
