On 9/18/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> limodou schrieb:
> > This code I copy from prototype, and made some changes, it doesnot
> > calculate the width and height, only x and y, but it's quicker than
> > jUtil.getPos(). BTW, I think interface plugins is wonderful, I begin
> > use it to replace some functions written by me.
> >
> > $.fn.coordinate = function(){
> >     e = this[0];
> >     var y = 0, x = 0;
> >     do {
> >       y += e.offsetTop  || 0;
> >       x += e.offsetLeft || 0;
> >       e = e.offsetParent;
> >       if (e) {
> >         if(e.tagName=='BODY') break;
> >         var p = $(e).position();
> >         if (p == 'relative' || p == 'absolute') break;
> >       }
> >     } while (e);
> >     return {x:x, y:y};
> > }
> >
> > It seems that iUtil.getPos() does not test BODY node, and does not
> > test position, so maybe these slow it down.
> >
>
> to make it xhtml as xml compatible you should normalize tagName:
>
> if (e.tagName.toLowerCase() == 'body') break;
>
>
Thanks.

-- 
I like python!
My Blog: http://www.donews.net/limodou
UliPad Site: http://wiki.woodpecker.org.cn/moin/UliPad
UliPad Maillist: http://groups.google.com/group/ulipad

_______________________________________________
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/

Reply via email to