Jörn Zaefferer schrieb: > Hi folks, > > after the discussion about the global ajax handlers and the question, if > the form plugin should be merged into the core, I'd like to know > wheather anyone has any other issues, problems or ideas for the AJAX > module that can be addressed. Now is the time! > > I'm currently adding lots of tests to make sure that the current code > works as documented (eg. timeout doesn't seem to work as expected) and > any refactorings won't break existing code. Planned are primarily > bugfixes, then the refactoring as proposed by Will > (http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/159/), then the mentioned above, merging > form and improving the global handlers, eg. allowing to override them.
Hi Jörn, John made a ticket for a local timeout option, like: $.ajax({ ... timeout: 5000, ... }); To have that would be nice. See here: http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/195/ I reported a bug that an unset Last-Modified header breaks Firefox. I'm not sure if my proposed fix is sufficient, but I think it is really important that this is fixed (If you haven't configured your server to set such header, Ajax simply does not work in Firefox 1.0). http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/165/ I also found, that the only way to load an html fragment with having script blocks evaluated is to use the load() method. Shouldn't that work with $.ajax and a dataType of "html" as well?. It seems to me, that people tend to use $.ajax more and more. Let me know if I can help out. > One issue that could use some opinions is this: > http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/196/ > Is there anyone who uses jQuery AND XMLHttpRequest directly? I think what is meant here, is that other libraries do IE browser sniffing by checking the XHR object, right? In my opinion, jQuery shouldn't be responsible for others bad code. -- Klaus _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/