> Are you saying that there should be a section on jQuery set aside for womens > issues?
Did I say such a thing? :-D I just point to the fact that using invalid XHTML will discourage *some* XHTML-savvy users, as putting a bimbo picture on the Magazine (p 12) -- with no explanation whatsoever of the DEVO-stuff -- will discourage *some* women (and maybe some "rabid feminists" as myself, lol). I mentioned Debian-women because they have produced interesting work on these issues, and invited you to read one of these articles. I don't claim that jQuery should have a jQuery-women project! > Internationalisation is another thing entirely however. There's clearly the > desire for jQuery to be translated, but maybe not those with the time, > experience and general knowhow. We have already actively started to translate the Magazine in French ;-) > If everyone who saw something offensive stayed away, youtube would a > failure, newsgroups would never have exploded, and slashdot would be empty > (apart from Wil Wheaton submitting odd articles about his time on Star > Trek!). Of course, trash TV works too. Our point here is to try and make things better. I think we all agree on this, and I'm getting back to my translation of the docs. -- Fil _______________________________________________ jQuery mailing list discuss@jquery.com http://jquery.com/discuss/
